Best DSLR Cameras under $1000

Dick De Jong, Updated July 17, 2012

Sony a65 Review

Of the five cameras in this shootout, when I am running out the door, the Sony a65 is the one I would grab.

This preference is not just based on specifications. A relationship with a camera is a very personal one. Often, it's love at first grip, but ultimately the bond is established through a series of positive reinforcements and a minimum of disappointments.

To begin, with the a65, the ample grip with the extra indentation gives you a solid, comfortable handhold. Next, the high resolution OLED viewfinder is a delight.

The camera is quick and responsive. And most importantly, the image quality is rewarding.

Is there any wonder why the Sony a65 has won the 2 Camera Guys Award for Best Mid-range DSLR Camera.

Sony a65 2CG Award Best Mid-Range DSLR

What's Hot about the Sony a65

  • 24MP CMOS APS-C sensor
  • Excellent image quality and dynamic range
  • Bright and high resolution electronic OLED viewfinder
  • Translucent mirror system allows always-on Live View
  • Up to 10 fps continuous full resolution shooting
  • Ample hand grip and good overall balance
  • Panorama, 3D and HDR shooting modes
  • Integrated image stabilization
  • 1080p video at multiple frame rates
  • Built-in GPS

What's Not So Caliente about the Sony a65

  • At least $200 more than other cameras in the shootout
  • Translucent mirror system reduces the amount of light hitting the sensor
  • Notable noise at ISOs over 1600
  • Should shoot RAW files to obtain full image quality
  • Full resolution 24MP files strain less powerful computers and gobble hard drive space

Design

One of the foundations for many of the Sony a65's design elements is the translucent mirror system. (In fact, the SLT in the model number, Alpha SLT a65, stands for Single Lens Translucent.)

Traditionally, DSLRs employ a mirror that sits behind the lens and reflects the image (in the form of light) up to the optical viewfinder, where you can frame and focus your photo.

When you press the shutter release, the mirror flips up out of the way and light hits the sensor, "exposing" your image.

For Sony a65 memory cards, see Camera Accessories

With the newer DSLRs, like the Canon and Nikons in this shootout, to switch into Live View mode, the mirror flips up and stays there until you are ready to snap your photo. Then the mirror drops down and then up again, causing a slight delay in the process.

The a65 still has a mirror located in the same spot, but it's translucent, letting about 80% of the light to pass through. The rest is reflected to a phase-detection autofocus sensor.

To view the image for focusing and framing, the camera captures it from the main sensor and either displays it on the three-inch LCD screen or onto the a65's high resolution OLED electronic viewfinder.

Sony a65 Translucent Mirror Technology

Since the mirror never has to move, Live View is in essence always on, which allows for less time between shots and continuous autofocusing even for movies.

Also, you can use the electronic viewfinder when shooting movies. With the other cameras, you have to be in Live View mode to capture movies, which means that the optical viewfinder is not operational and you are limited to looking at the three-inch screen.

As an added bonus, to start recording a Movie on the Sony a65, you simply push the red Movie button. As you will see later, the process is not so straightforward on the other cameras.

The one drawback to this translucent system is that some of the light coming through the lens is constantly being diverted to the autofocus sensor. Light is a precious commodity when photographing, but the amount of light being lost is considered insignificant.

Sony a65 2CG Award Best Mid-Range DSLR

As for the rest of the design, the layout of buttons and controls is sensible, without any major annoyances.

And even though the electronic viewfinder is one of the best of any cameras on the market, many photographers, young and old, will enjoy the convenience of the articulating screen.

Unlike the Canon T4i, the Canon T3i and the Nikon D3200, which have the screen hinge on the left side, the a65's hinge is on the bottom, which makes it a bit awkward in certain positions, but still appreciated when creaky knees do not want to bend for an ant's POV shot.

Image Quality

The image quality produced by the Sony a65's 24MP sensor and BIONZ image processor is excellent. And the extra resolution of the 6000 x 4000 pixel images can come in handy when you need to crop your photo but still wish to print it at an 8 x 10 or larger size.

One of the snipes at stuffing 24MP onto an APS-C sensor is that the images can exhibit more noise than a sensor with fewer pixels. Indeed, shots taken with an ISO over 1600 start to exhibit noise, which is usually not distracting.

But if you are capturing JPEGs at ISO's over 6400, the noise might be unacceptable to a more discerning eye.

PhotoScope

PhotoScope: Compare Sony a65 at Different ISOs

In this PhotoScope comparison, you can see how noise becomes more apparent as the ISO value becomes larger. To begin, if you click the PhotoScope link, the image on the left has the ISO at 100, the one on the right is ISO 6400. If you roll the Scope over the blue and purple label on the olive jar, you can clearly see the noise in the right image. Cycle through some of the other ISO settings to judge how the a65 fares.

One of the ways of controlling the quality is to shoot in the RAW format and then post process the images in a program like Adobe's Camera Raw or Apple's Aperture.

If that sounds like way too much bother, then when you shoot JPEGs try to keep the ISO at 1600 or less and you should be pleased with the results. Sony a65 Best Mid-range DSLR

The image on the right, (from the Gaultier exhibit at the De Young Museum), was originally captured by the a65 as a RAW file at an ISO of 3200. (Click it to see a higher resolution rendering.)

The video quality from the a65 is very good. In fact, this camera is the choice over the others for shooting video for a couple of reasons.

First, the a65's continuous autofocus feature is better than the rest. It seems quicker with less back and forth searching. Also the focus servo is quieter, though it is still loud enough to be recorded by the internal microphone.

In addition, the ability to use the viewfinder when recording a movie can be invaluable in bright light situations.

With that said, DSLRs are not the perfect video cameras. Most of them have a built-in limit of 20 minutes continuous recording. And often they will stop before that time because they are overheating, which is definitely not ideal for event videography.

Features

The Sony a65 is the most feature laden camera in the shootout with goodies like HDR (High Dynamic Range), Panorama and 3D shooting modes.

Sony even offers two sweep panorama settings, Standard and Wide (a whopping 12416 × 1856 pixel image).

Sony a65 Panorama of San Francisco Skyline
Sony a65 Standard Panorama of San Francisco Skyline
Original image was 7438 × 1685 pixels

Of course, the menu also includes the prerequisite list of picture effects (like Toy Camera, Pop Color and Partial Color) and scene modes (like Portrait, Sports Action, Macro, and Landscape).

On a less flashy level, the camera provides an integrated image stabilization system, which works no matter what lens is attached.

The a65 is also the only model in the shootout with built-in GPS. When activated, it will tag your photos with longitude and latitude coordinates that can be mapped in programs like Flickr.

Verdict

The Sony a65 is definitely the best camera in this shootout and if you are ready to drop about $1000, the features and image quality of this 24MP Sony Alpha make it money well spent.

If you want to leverage the inherent goodness of this 2 Camera Guys Best Mid-range DSLR, then bypass the kit lens package and opt for the body only and a higher quality Sony prime lens.

Sony a65 Photo Gallery


More about the Sony a65

Sony a65 spec sheet

PhotoScope

Compare the Sony a65 to the Competition

Reader Comments(8 comments)

Posted Oct 10, 2013 8:31:16 PM
By Big Mike
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I wasn't aware that the Sony was unable to autofocus in manual mode. The superior video autofocusing was the only reason why I was considering the a65, but what's the point if I have no control over depth of field? It's also my understanding that you can't control the aperture while in live view on the Nikons. Both shortcomings are reasons enough for me to go with the Canon T4i; the autofocusing (in live view and video) could be better, but you have full manual control.
Posted Nov 2, 2012 8:54:18 PM
By Kuro
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Hey how 'bout the Pentax K-30 which is as good or better than the T4i but $100 less.
Posted Oct 31, 2012 11:52:07 AM
By Peteralex
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I was planning to buy the a65. Read everything about it. Fine. Went to the store and my, not too tall, not to wide, very healthy born fingers were automatically cramped into position at the grip. Not so good. It felt very uncomfortable. The body is a normal size, only the grip is truly disappointing. Especially the rubber thingy that places itself between the fingers at the front makes that you can't move your fingers elsewhere.. so totally forced bent fingertips were the result of trying to just hold the camera and make a picture, or just grab it. Or for example, to get it out of a bag. Too bad sony. This I noticed ofcourse also with the a57 (which had a horrible viewfinder). I now have the a390 and the a580. Those grips vary just a little but have more grab comfort and room. The a77 is bigger, lets put my hope on that one (havent tried it yet).
Posted Sep 2, 2012 7:49:54 PM
By krazi311
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
ok so im really confused on which to buy now... The a65 or Rebel t4i?? Reading these reviews have made it even more difficult due to the great research put into them. I'm new to photography and this will be my first dslr. Having the touchscreen is cool but not vital. If they both had it then this might be a little easier. I wouldnt be shooting videos, mostly still shots. Action shots? do you really need the 10 fps or is 5 good enough? Can some one please help me?! I dont mind spending the money on the a65 but in the long run whats better for me.
Posted Aug 28, 2012 3:30:02 PM
By Dick De Jong
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Art,

Suggesting lenses for others is always a tough call for reasons too long to list.

If you are interested in high quality and are ready to make the commitment, then Zeiss lenses are great choices, but they come at a premium price tag.

For example, the Sony 85mm F1.4 ZA Carl Zeiss Planar T* is a wonderful portrait prime lens. Of course, at $1600, it's almost twice the price of the a65 body alone. But good lenses can last through multiple generations of cameras.
Posted Aug 28, 2012 2:55:55 PM
By Dick De Jong
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Frazzywig,

I've been shooting video for decades and I'm still not convinced that any of these DSLRs are the perfect solution for capturing video. (I listed many of those reasons in my article, Making Home Movies: http://www.2cameraguys.com/Making-Home-Movies-with-Digital-Cameras.htm)

With that said, I do not discount your preference of the T4i over the a65 when shooting video. I will say that if you plan to use autofocus with any of these cameras, then expect to capture segments of out of focus searching, which you will need to edit.

And if you want higher quality audio, then you will need to use an external microphone and ideally a good audio recorder.

I'll admit that I am still rating these cameras more for their still image abilities and less on their video. Accordingly, the Sony a65 is on the top of my list. But as I've said, the T4i is a very good camera, which you should enjoy.
Posted Aug 14, 2012 12:06:07 PM
By frazzywig
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I've been planning on getting the t4i for a while now, but after reading this review and then taking a couple more looks at the a65, I have to admit I was blown away by the Sony offering. I wanted to do a little more research but was almost certain that I'd be going for the a65 rather than that t4i. I'm glad I ended up taking the extra time to search out bad aspects of the a65 because I found some fairly important omissions to this review. I should note that I'm primarily interested in using the camera for video. Most of the omitted drawbacks that I'm referring to pertain to video: There is an additional sensor crop beyond the native APS-C (1.6x) size when shooting video, making the crop somewhere around 1.85x (that's no small amount when you want to be able to get your money's worth from wide glass), the a65 is unable to shoot video beyond 1600 ISO, it's also unable to shoot with full time auto focus in manual mode (so you can't specify an aperture while using AF in video), audio has no level control at all - the gain is controlled automatically. None the less, I appreciate your efforts in putting up a good review. I have not put in the work and I appreciate that you have. I’d just like to let you know that I think these issues really should have knocked the a65 down to 2nd place, below the t4i. Just my opinion.
Posted Aug 9, 2012 6:53:25 PM
By Art
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
You mention the suggestion of buying only the body and buying a separate Sony Prime lens. Any specific suggestions (with links)?