|
Samsung WB250F
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
vs |
Nikon S9300
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
|
|
What’s good about the Samsung WB250F
Best price
$219
- Weighs a little bit less than the S9300 6.49 oz vs 7.6 oz
- Smaller body size 9 in³ vs 14 in³
- Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.85″ vs 1.3″
- 45% more battery life 290 shots vs 200 shots
- Slightly cheaper street price $219 vs $249
- Has longer exposure available 16 seconds vs 4 seconds
- Newer camera February 2013 vs February 2012
- Faster continuous shooting speed 8 shots per sec vs 7 shots per sec
- Has HDR on-board S9300 does not have HDR
- Has panorama image capture S9300 does not have panorama
- Has Wi-Fi photo upload capabilities S9300 does not have Wi-Fi
Find out more about the
Samsung WB250F
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S9300
Best price
$249
$249
- Higher sensor resolution 16 MP vs 14.2 MP
- Higher resolution rear screen 921k dots vs 460k dots
- Has GPS location tagging WB250F does not have GPS
- Has an HDMI port for photo playback WB250F does not have HDMI
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S9300
What the Samsung WB250F and Nikon S9300 have in common
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- The same maximum ISO setting 3200 ISO
- Similar optical zoom range 18.0×
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
- Same quality video capture 1080p 30fps
- 3D capture
What’s missing from both the Samsung WB250F and the Nikon S9300
-
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No flip out viewscreen
