Samsung ST200
Budget Compact Camera
 vs Olympus VR-310
Budget Compact Camera

What’s good about the Samsung ST200F

Best price $199
  • Weighs a little bit less than the VR-310 4.96 oz vs 5.6 oz
  • Smaller body size 7 in³ vs 10 in³
  • Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.74″ vs 1.1″
  • Higher sensor resolution 16.1 MP vs 14 MP
  • Higher resolution rear screen 460k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has longer exposure available 8 seconds vs 4 seconds
  • Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
  • Newer camera January 2012 vs April 2011
  • Has Wi-Fi photo upload capabilities VR-310 does not have Wi-Fi
Find out more about the Samsung ST200F

What’s good about the Olympus VR-310

Best price
$80
  • Significantly cheaper street price $80 vs $199
Find out more about the Olympus VR-310

What the Samsung ST200 and Olympus VR-310 have in common

  • Similar image sensor size 28 in²
  • Similar optical zoom range 10.0×
  • Same viewscreen size 3.0″
  • Same quality video capture 720p 30fps
  • panorama mode

What’s missing from both the Samsung ST200 and the Olympus VR-310

  • No HDR processing
  • No HDMI port
  • No 3D capture
  • No GPS tagging
  • No waterproof housing
  • No external microphone jack
  • No RAW capture
  • No hot shoe
  • No flip out viewscreen
Side-by-side: Compare the Samsung ST200 and the Olympus VR-310 side-by-side

Want to compare other cameras?

  • Compare the Samsung ST200 to the
  • Compare the Olympus VR-310 to the
Sister Sites: ProjectorCentral HDTV Solutions BigScreenForums