|
Olympus XZ-1
Premium Compact Camera
|
vs |
Nikon S9300
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
|
|
What’s good about the Olympus XZ-1
Best price
$289
- 60% more battery life 320 shots vs 200 shots
- Significantly larger image sensor 45 mm² vs 28 mm²
- Has longer exposure available 60 seconds vs 4 seconds
- Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
- More popular with users 90% vs 84%
- Faster continuous shooting speed 8 shots per sec vs 7 shots per sec
- Has panorama image capture S9300 does not have panorama
- Has a flash hot shoe connector S9300 does not
- Has an External Mic jack S9300 does not
- Has RAW image capture S9300 does not have RAW capture
Find out more about the
Olympus XZ-1
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S9300
Best price
$249
$249
- Weighs a little bit less than the XZ-1 7.6 oz vs 9.7 oz
- Smaller body size 14 in³ vs 19 in³
- Slightly cheaper street price $249 vs $289
- Higher sensor resolution 16 MP vs 10 MP
- Higher resolution rear screen 921k dots vs 614k dots
- Newer camera February 2012 vs February 2011
- Longer optical zoom 18.0× vs 4.0×
- Wider angle lens 4.5mm vs 6.0mm
- Better video capture 1080p 30fps vs 720p 30fps
- Has GPS location tagging XZ-1 does not have GPS
- Has 3D capture capabilities XZ-1 does not have 3D
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S9300
What the Olympus XZ-1 and Nikon S9300 have in common
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
- Both are popular cameras based on user ratings
- HDMI port
What’s missing from both the Olympus XZ-1 and the Nikon S9300
-
No HDR processing -
No waterproof housing -
No Wi-Fi -
No flip out viewscreen
