|
Canon A3300 IS
Budget Compact Camera
|
vs |
Nikon P310
Budget Compact Camera
|
|
|
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot A3300 IS
Best price
$196
- Weighs a little bit less than the P310 4.6 oz vs 6.9 oz
- Smaller body size 8 in³ vs 12 in³
- Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.94″ vs 1.3″
- Significantly cheaper street price $196 vs $700
- Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 4 seconds
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot A3300 IS
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX P310
Best price
$700
$700
- Higher resolution rear screen 921k dots vs 230k dots
- Newer camera February 2012 vs January 2011
- Better built-in flash range 21′ vs 13′
- Better video capture 1080p 30fps vs 720p 30fps
- Faster continuous shooting speed 7 shots per sec vs 3 shots per sec
- Has HDR on-board A3300 IS does not have HDR
- Has panorama image capture A3300 IS does not have panorama
- Has 3D capture capabilities A3300 IS does not have 3D
- Has an HDMI port for photo playback A3300 IS does not have HDMI
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX P310
What the Canon A3300 IS and Nikon P310 have in common
- Similar sensor resolutions 16 MP vs 16.1 MP
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- The same maximum ISO setting 6400 ISO
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
What’s missing from both the Canon A3300 IS and the Nikon P310
-
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No Wi-Fi -
No flip out viewscreen
