|
Samsung WB150F
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
vs |
Canon SX160 IS
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
|
|
What’s good about the Samsung WB150F
Best price
$225
- Weighs a little bit less than the SX160 IS 6.64 oz vs 10.3 oz
- Significantly smaller body size 9 in³ vs 22 in³
- Significantly cheaper street price $225 vs $350
- Higher resolution rear screen 460k dots vs 230k dots
- Better light sensitivity by 2 f-stops 3,200 ISO vs 800 ISO
- Wider angle lens 4.0mm vs 5.0mm
- Quicker Flash Recycle Time 4 seconds vs 15 seconds
- Has panorama image capture SX160 IS does not have panorama
- Has Wi-Fi photo upload capabilities SX160 IS does not have Wi-Fi
Find out more about the
Samsung WB150F
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Best price
$350
$350
- 41% more battery life 380 shots vs 270 shots
- Higher sensor resolution 16 MP vs 14.2 MP
- Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 8 seconds
- Newer camera August 2012 vs January 2012
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
What the Samsung WB150F and Canon SX160 IS have in common
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
- Same quality video capture 720p 30fps
- HDMI port
What’s missing from both the Samsung WB150F and the Canon SX160 IS
-
No HDR processing -
No 3D capture -
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No flip out viewscreen
