|
Samsung ST66
Budget Compact Camera
|
vs |
Canon A2300
Budget Compact Camera
|
|
|
What’s good about the Samsung ST66
Best price
$100
- Weighs a little bit less than the A2300 3.56 oz vs 4.41 oz
- Smaller body size 5 in³ vs 6 in³
- Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.67″ vs 0.79″
- 33% more battery life 280 shots vs 210 shots
- Significantly cheaper street price $100 vs $249
- Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
- Better built-in flash range 14′ vs 10′
- Quicker Flash Recycle Time 4 seconds vs 10 seconds
- Better video capture 720p 30fps vs 720p 25fps
- Has panorama image capture A2300 does not have panorama
Find out more about the
Samsung ST66
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot A2300
Best price
$249
$249
- Higher resolution rear screen 230k dots vs 23k dots
- Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 8 seconds
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot A2300
What the Samsung ST66 and Canon A2300 have in common
- Similar sensor resolutions 16.1 MP vs 16 MP
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Both cameras are the same age March 2012 vs February 2012
- Similar optical zoom range 5.0×
- Same viewscreen size 2.7″
What’s missing from both the Samsung ST66 and the Canon A2300
-
No HDR processing -
No HDMI port -
No 3D capture -
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No Wi-Fi -
No flip out viewscreen
