Nikon S9600
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
vs |
Canon SX600 HS
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
![]() |
![]() |
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S9600
Best price
$280
- Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
- Better video capture 1080p 60fps vs 1080p 30fps
- Has panorama image capture SX600 HS does not have panorama
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S9600
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot SX600 HS
Best price
$359
$359
- Smaller body size 10 in³ vs 14 in³
- Thinner body for better pocket fit 1.02″ vs 1.3″
- 48% more battery life 430 shots vs 290 shots
- Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 4 seconds
- Faster continuous shooting speed 11 shots per sec vs 7 shots per sec
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot SX600 HS
What the Nikon S9600 and Canon SX600 HS have in common
- Weigh about the same 7.3 oz vs 6.63 oz
- Similar sensor resolutions 16 MP
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Similar viewscreen resolutions 460k dots vs 461k dots
- Both cameras are the same age February 2014 vs March 2014
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
- HDMI port
- Wi-Fi
What’s missing from both the Nikon S9600 and the Canon SX600 HS
-
No HDR processing -
No 3D capture -
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No flip out viewscreen