|
Nikon S9600
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
vs |
Canon SX260 HS
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
|
|
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S9600
Best price
$280
- Weighs a little bit less than the SX260 HS 7.3 oz vs 8.15 oz
- 26% more battery life 290 shots vs 230 shots
- Higher sensor resolution 16 MP vs 12.1 MP
- Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
- Newer camera February 2014 vs March 2012
- Better video capture 1080p 60fps vs 1080p 24fps
- Has panorama image capture SX260 HS does not have panorama
- Has Wi-Fi photo upload capabilities SX260 HS does not have Wi-Fi
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S9600
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
Best price
$339
$339
- Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 4 seconds
- Faster continuous shooting speed 10 shots per sec vs 7 shots per sec
- Has GPS location tagging S9600 does not have GPS
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
What the Nikon S9600 and Canon SX260 HS have in common
- Similar Body sizes 14 in³ vs 13 in³
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Similar viewscreen resolutions 460k dots vs 461k dots
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
- HDMI port
What’s missing from both the Nikon S9600 and the Canon SX260 HS
-
No HDR processing -
No 3D capture -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No flip out viewscreen
