Nikon S9500
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
vs |
Olympus SZ-16
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
![]() |
![]() |
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S9500
Best price
$350
- Smaller body size 14 in³ vs 17 in³
- Higher sensor resolution 18.1 MP vs 16 MP
- Higher resolution rear screen 614k dots vs 460k dots
- Faster continuous shooting speed 8 shots per sec vs 3 shots per sec
- Has GPS location tagging SZ-16 does not have GPS
- Has Wi-Fi photo upload capabilities SZ-16 does not have Wi-Fi
- Has 3D capture capabilities SZ-16 does not have 3D
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S9500
What’s good about the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
Best price
$250
$250
- 30% more battery life 300 shots vs 230 shots
- Cheaper street price $250 vs $350
- Better light sensitivity by 2 f-stops 6,400 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
- Better built-in flash range 43′ vs 19′
- Has HDR on-board S9500 does not have HDR
Find out more about the
Olympus SZ-16 iHS
What the Nikon S9500 and Olympus SZ-16 have in common
- Weigh about the same 7.3 oz vs 8 oz
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Both cameras are the same age February 2013 vs March 2013
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
- Same quality video capture 1080p 30fps
- HDMI port
- panorama mode
What’s missing from both the Nikon S9500 and the Olympus SZ-16
-
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No flip out viewscreen