Nikon S9200
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
vs |
Nikon P310
Budget Compact Camera
|
![]() |
![]() |
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S9200
Best price
$300
- Significantly cheaper street price $300 vs $700
- Newer camera December 2012 vs February 2012
- Longer optical zoom 18.0× vs 4.2×
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S9200
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX P310
Best price
$700
$700
- 15% more battery life 230 shots vs 200 shots
- Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
- Better built-in flash range 21′ vs 16′
- Has HDR on-board S9200 does not have HDR
- Has 3D capture capabilities S9200 does not have 3D
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX P310
What the Nikon S9200 and Nikon P310 have in common
- Weigh about the same 7.4 oz vs 6.9 oz
- Similar Body sizes 13 in³ vs 12 in³
- Similar sensor resolutions 16 MP vs 16.1 MP
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Similar viewscreen resolutions 921k dots
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
- Same quality video capture 1080p 30fps
- Similar continuous shooting speed 7 shots per second vs 7 shots per second
- HDMI port
- panorama mode
What’s missing from both the Nikon S9200 and the Nikon P310
-
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No Wi-Fi -
No flip out viewscreen
Side-by-side:
Compare the
Nikon S9200
and the
Nikon P310
side-by-side