Nikon S3300
Budget Compact Camera
 vs Samsung WB30F
Budget Compact Camera

What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300

Best price $199
  • Significantly cheaper street price $199 vs $300
Find out more about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300

What’s good about the Samsung WB30F

Best price
$300
  • Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.65″ vs 0.8″
  • 14% more battery life 240 shots vs 210 shots
  • Has longer exposure available 16 seconds vs 4 seconds
  • Newer camera April 2013 vs January 2012
  • Longer optical zoom 10.0× vs 6.0×
  • Bigger rear viewscreen 3.0″ vs 2.7″
  • Better video capture 720p 60fps vs 720p 30fps
  • Has Wi-Fi photo upload capabilities S3300 does not have Wi-Fi
  • Has 3D capture capabilities S3300 does not have 3D
  • Has an HDMI port for photo playback S3300 does not have HDMI
Find out more about the Samsung WB30F

What the Nikon S3300 and Samsung WB30F have in common

  • Weigh about the same 4.6 oz
  • Similar Body sizes 7 in³ vs 8 in³
  • Similar sensor resolutions 16 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Similar image sensor size 28 in²
  • Similar viewscreen resolutions 230k dots
  • The same maximum ISO setting 3200 ISO
  • panorama mode

What’s missing from both the Nikon S3300 and the Samsung WB30F

  • No HDR processing
  • No GPS tagging
  • No waterproof housing
  • No external microphone jack
  • No RAW capture
  • No hot shoe
  • No flip out viewscreen
Side-by-side: Compare the Nikon S3300 and the Samsung WB30F side-by-side

Want to compare other cameras?

  • Compare the Nikon S3300 to the
  • Compare the Samsung WB30F to the
Sister Sites: ProjectorCentral HDTV Solutions BigScreenForums