Nikon S3300
Budget Compact Camera
|
vs |
Nikon S4300
Budget Compact Camera
|
![]() |
![]() |
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300
Best price
$199
- Smaller body size 7 in³ vs 8 in³
- Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.8″ vs 0.9″
- 17% more battery life 210 shots vs 180 shots
- Cheaper street price $199 vs $295
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S3300
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S4300
Best price
$295
$295
- Higher resolution rear screen 460k dots vs 230k dots
- Bigger rear viewscreen 3.0″ vs 2.7″
- More popular with users 90% vs 82%
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S4300
What the Nikon S3300 and Nikon S4300 have in common
- Weigh about the same 4.6 oz vs 5 oz
- Similar sensor resolutions 16 MP
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- The same maximum ISO setting 3200 ISO
- Both cameras are the same age January 2012 vs March 2012
- Similar optical zoom range 6.0×
- Both are popular cameras based on user ratings
- Same quality video capture 720p 30fps
- Similar continuous shooting speed 6 shots per second
- panorama mode
What’s missing from both the Nikon S3300 and the Nikon S4300
-
No HDR processing -
No HDMI port -
No 3D capture -
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No Wi-Fi -
No flip out viewscreen
Side-by-side:
Compare the
Nikon S3300
and the
Nikon S4300
side-by-side