Nikon S3300
Budget Compact Camera
 vs Nikon S32
Budget Compact Camera

What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300

Best price $199
  • Weighs a little bit less than the S32 4.6 oz vs 6.2 oz
  • Significantly smaller body size 7 in³ vs 19 in³
  • Higher sensor resolution 16 MP vs 13.2 MP
  • Significantly larger image sensor 28 mm² vs 17 mm²
  • Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
  • Longer optical zoom 6.0× vs 3.0×
  • Faster continuous shooting speed 6 shots per sec vs 5 shots per sec
  • Has panorama image capture S32 does not have panorama
Find out more about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300

What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S32

Best price
$97
  • Significantly cheaper street price $97 vs $199
  • Newer camera March 2014 vs January 2012
  • Better video capture 1080p 30fps vs 720p 30fps
  • Has a waterproof camera body S3300 does not
  • Has an HDMI port for photo playback S3300 does not have HDMI
Find out more about the Nikon COOLPIX S32

What the Nikon S3300 and Nikon S32 have in common

  • Similar viewscreen resolutions 230k dots
  • Same viewscreen size 2.7″

What’s missing from both the Nikon S3300 and the Nikon S32

  • No HDR processing
  • No 3D capture
  • No GPS tagging
  • No external microphone jack
  • No RAW capture
  • No hot shoe
  • No Wi-Fi
  • No flip out viewscreen
Side-by-side: Compare the Nikon S3300 and the Nikon S32 side-by-side

Want to compare other cameras?

  • Compare the Nikon S3300 to the
  • Compare the Nikon S32 to the
Sister Sites: ProjectorCentral HDTV Solutions BigScreenForums