|
Nikon S3300
Budget Compact Camera
|
vs |
Canon A3400 IS
Budget Compact Camera
|
|
|
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300
Best price
$199
- 17% more battery life 210 shots vs 180 shots
- Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
- Better video capture 720p 30fps vs 720p 25fps
- Has panorama image capture A3400 IS does not have panorama
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S3300
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot A3400 IS
Best price
$150
$150
- Cheaper street price $150 vs $199
- Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 4 seconds
- Bigger rear viewscreen 3.0″ vs 2.7″
- More popular with users 88% vs 82%
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot A3400 IS
What the Nikon S3300 and Canon A3400 IS have in common
- Weigh about the same 4.6 oz vs 4.97 oz
- Similar Body sizes 7 in³ vs 7 in³
- Similar sensor resolutions 16 MP
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Similar viewscreen resolutions 230k dots
- Both cameras are the same age January 2012 vs February 2012
- Both are popular cameras based on user ratings
What’s missing from both the Nikon S3300 and the Canon A3400 IS
-
No HDR processing -
No HDMI port -
No 3D capture -
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No Wi-Fi -
No flip out viewscreen
