Nikon S3300
Budget Compact Camera
 vs Canon A2500
Budget Compact Camera

What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300

Best price $199
  • Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
  • Better video capture 720p 30fps vs 720p 25fps
  • Faster continuous shooting speed 6 shots per sec vs 1 shots per sec
  • Has panorama image capture A2500 does not have panorama
Find out more about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300

What’s good about the Canon PowerShot A2500

Best price
$200
  • Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 4 seconds
  • Newer camera April 2013 vs January 2012
  • Has an HDMI port for photo playback S3300 does not have HDMI
Find out more about the Canon PowerShot A2500

What the Nikon S3300 and Canon A2500 have in common

  • Weigh about the same 4.6 oz vs 4.41 oz
  • Similar Body sizes 7 in³ vs 7 in³
  • Similar street prices $199 vs $200
  • Similar sensor resolutions 16 MP
  • Similar image sensor size 28 in²
  • Similar viewscreen resolutions 230k dots
  • Same viewscreen size 2.7″

What’s missing from both the Nikon S3300 and the Canon A2500

  • No HDR processing
  • No 3D capture
  • No GPS tagging
  • No waterproof housing
  • No external microphone jack
  • No RAW capture
  • No hot shoe
  • No Wi-Fi
  • No flip out viewscreen
Side-by-side: Compare the Nikon S3300 and the Canon A2500 side-by-side

Want to compare other cameras?

  • Compare the Nikon S3300 to the
  • Compare the Canon A2500 to the
Sister Sites: ProjectorCentral HDTV Solutions BigScreenForums