Nikon S3200
Budget Compact Camera
|
vs |
Canon A2200
Budget Compact Camera
|
![]() |
![]() |
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S3200
Best price
$140
- Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.8″ vs 0.93″
- Significantly cheaper street price $140 vs $259
- Higher sensor resolution 16 MP vs 14.1 MP
- Newer camera December 2012 vs January 2011
- Longer optical zoom 6.0× vs 4.0×
- Has panorama image capture A2200 does not have panorama
- Has an HDMI port for photo playback A2200 does not have HDMI
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S3200
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot A2200
Best price
$259
$259
- Weighs a little bit less than the S3200 4.06 oz vs 4.6 oz
- Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 4 seconds
- Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
- Faster continuous shooting speed 3 shots per sec vs 1 shots per sec
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot A2200
What the Nikon S3200 and Canon A2200 have in common
- Similar Body sizes 7 in³ vs 8 in³
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Similar viewscreen resolutions 230k dots
- Same viewscreen size 2.7″
- Similiar flash ranges 14′ vs 13′
- Same quality video capture 720p 30fps
What’s missing from both the Nikon S3200 and the Canon A2200
-
No HDR processing -
No 3D capture -
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No Wi-Fi -
No flip out viewscreen
Side-by-side:
Compare the
Nikon S3200
and the
Canon A2200
side-by-side