FujiFilm X-M1
Mirrorless Camera
|
vs |
Sony NEX 3N
Mirrorless Camera
|
![]() |
![]() |
What’s good about the FujiFilm X-M1
Best price
$900
- Higher resolution rear screen 920k dots vs 461k dots
- Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 25,600 ISO vs 16,000 ISO
- Better video capture 1080p 30fps vs 1080p 24fps
- Faster continuous shooting speed 6 shots per sec vs 4 shots per sec
- Has Wi-Fi photo upload capabilities NEX 3N does not have Wi-Fi
- Has a flash hot shoe connector NEX 3N does not
Find out more about the
FujiFilm X-M1
What’s good about the Sony Alpha NEX 3N
Best price
$450
$450
- Weighs a little bit less than the X-M1 9.5 oz vs 11.6 oz
- Smaller body size 15 in³ vs 18 in³
- 37% more battery life 480 shots vs 350 shots
- Significantly cheaper street price $450 vs $900
- Has HDR on-board X-M1 does not have HDR
- Has panorama image capture X-M1 does not have panorama
- Has 3D capture capabilities X-M1 does not have 3D
Find out more about the
Sony Alpha NEX 3N
What the FujiFilm X-M1 and Sony NEX 3N have in common
- Similar sensor resolutions 16.3 MP vs 16.1 MP
- Similar image sensor size 368 in² vs 367 in²
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
- interchangeable lenses
- HDMI port
- RAW capture
- flip out viewscreen
What’s missing from both the FujiFilm X-M1 and the Sony NEX 3N
-
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack