Canon SX260 HS
Compact Superzoom Camera
 vs Nikon S3300
Budget Compact Camera

What’s good about the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Best price $339
  • Higher resolution rear screen 461k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 4 seconds
  • Longer optical zoom 20.0× vs 6.0×
  • Bigger rear viewscreen 3.0″ vs 2.7″
  • Better video capture 1080p 24fps vs 720p 30fps
  • More popular with users 90% vs 82%
  • Faster continuous shooting speed 10 shots per sec vs 6 shots per sec
  • Has GPS location tagging S3300 does not have GPS
  • Has an HDMI port for photo playback S3300 does not have HDMI
Find out more about the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300

Best price
$199
  • Weighs a lot less than the SX260 HS 4.6 oz vs 8.15 oz
  • Significantly smaller body size 7 in³ vs 13 in³
  • Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.8″ vs 1.29″
  • Significantly cheaper street price $199 vs $339
  • Higher sensor resolution 16 MP vs 12.1 MP
  • Has panorama image capture SX260 HS does not have panorama
Find out more about the Nikon COOLPIX S3300

What the Canon SX260 HS and Nikon S3300 have in common

  • Similar image sensor size 28 in²
  • The same maximum ISO setting 3200 ISO
  • Both cameras are the same age March 2012 vs January 2012
  • Both are popular cameras based on user ratings

What’s missing from both the Canon SX260 HS and the Nikon S3300

  • No HDR processing
  • No 3D capture
  • No waterproof housing
  • No external microphone jack
  • No RAW capture
  • No hot shoe
  • No Wi-Fi
  • No flip out viewscreen
Side-by-side: Compare the Canon SX260 HS and the Nikon S3300 side-by-side

Want to compare other cameras?

  • Compare the Canon SX260 HS to the
  • Compare the Nikon S3300 to the
Sister Sites: ProjectorCentral HDTV Solutions BigScreenForums