|
Canon ELPH 520 HS
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
vs |
Samsung WB150F
Compact Superzoom Camera
|
|
|
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Best price
$288
- Weighs a little bit less than the WB150F 4.76 oz vs 6.64 oz
- Smaller body size 6 in³ vs 9 in³
- Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.76″ vs 0.92″
- Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 8 seconds
- Better video capture 1080p 24fps vs 720p 30fps
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
What’s good about the Samsung WB150F
Best price
$225
$225
- 42% more battery life 270 shots vs 190 shots
- Cheaper street price $225 vs $288
- Higher sensor resolution 14.2 MP vs 10.1 MP
- Significantly larger image sensor 28 mm² vs 17 mm²
- Longer optical zoom 18.0× vs 12.0×
- Quicker Flash Recycle Time 4 seconds vs 10 seconds
- Has panorama image capture ELPH 520 HS does not have panorama
- Has Wi-Fi photo upload capabilities ELPH 520 HS does not have Wi-Fi
Find out more about the
Samsung WB150F
What the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Samsung WB150F have in common
- Similar viewscreen resolutions 461k dots vs 460k dots
- The same maximum ISO setting 3200 ISO
- Both cameras are the same age January 2012 vs January 2012
- Same viewscreen size 3.0″
- HDMI port
What’s missing from both the Canon ELPH 520 HS and the Samsung WB150F
-
No HDR processing -
No 3D capture -
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No flip out viewscreen
