|
Canon A2500
Budget Compact Camera
|
vs |
Canon A3300 IS
Budget Compact Camera
|
|
|
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot A2500
Best price
$200
- Smaller body size 7 in³ vs 8 in³
- Thinner body for better pocket fit 0.82″ vs 0.94″
- Newer camera April 2013 vs January 2011
- Has an HDMI port for photo playback A3300 IS does not have HDMI
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot A2500
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot A3300 IS
Best price
$196
$196
- Better light sensitivity by 2 f-stops 6,400 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
- Bigger rear viewscreen 3.0″ vs 2.7″
- Better built-in flash range 13′ vs 10′
- Better video capture 720p 30fps vs 720p 25fps
- Faster continuous shooting speed 3 shots per sec vs 1 shots per sec
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot A3300 IS
What the Canon A2500 and Canon A3300 IS have in common
- Weigh about the same 4.41 oz vs 4.6 oz
- Similar street prices $200 vs $196
- Similar sensor resolutions 16 MP
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Similar viewscreen resolutions 230k dots
- Similar optical zoom range 5.0×
- Similiar flash recycle times 10 seconds
What’s missing from both the Canon A2500 and the Canon A3300 IS
-
No HDR processing -
No 3D capture -
No panorama mode -
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No Wi-Fi -
No flip out viewscreen
