Canon A2300
Budget Compact Camera
|
vs |
Nikon S3200
Budget Compact Camera
|
![]() |
![]() |
What’s good about the Canon PowerShot A2300
Best price
$249
- Smaller body size 6 in³ vs 7 in³
- Has longer exposure available 15 seconds vs 4 seconds
Find out more about the
Canon PowerShot A2300
What’s good about the Nikon COOLPIX S3200
Best price
$140
$140
- Significantly cheaper street price $140 vs $249
- Better light sensitivity by 1 f-stop 3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
- Newer camera December 2012 vs February 2012
- Better built-in flash range 14′ vs 10′
- Better video capture 720p 30fps vs 720p 25fps
- Has panorama image capture A2300 does not have panorama
- Has an HDMI port for photo playback A2300 does not have HDMI
Find out more about the
Nikon COOLPIX S3200
What the Canon A2300 and Nikon S3200 have in common
- Weigh about the same 4.41 oz vs 4.6 oz
- Similar sensor resolutions 16 MP
- Similar image sensor size 28 in²
- Similar viewscreen resolutions 230k dots
- Same viewscreen size 2.7″
What’s missing from both the Canon A2300 and the Nikon S3200
-
No HDR processing -
No 3D capture -
No GPS tagging -
No waterproof housing -
No external microphone jack -
No RAW capture -
No hot shoe -
No Wi-Fi -
No flip out viewscreen
Side-by-side:
Compare the
Canon A2300
and the
Nikon S3200
side-by-side