Best Mirrorless Camera:
Shootout of Six Top Models

Dick De Jong, Updated August 15, 2012

Samsung NX200


The Samsung NX200 is the "not quite" camera.

It's not quite small enough to pocket; the zoom (on the kit lens) is not quite long enough; you cannot quite see the screen in sunlight; and the price is not quite low enough. Therefore, the NX200 does quite not make it to the top of our Mirrorless Camera shootout. Samsung NX200 Top

Still, with that said, this industrial-looking, solidly-built camera could become your travel companion - if you don't desire a viewfinder. Smaller and lighter than a DSLR, the NX200 is semi-easy to lug around but more essentially, it takes very respectable pictures - better than many of the other mirrorless cameras.

That's because of it large APS-C CMOS sensor with a 20.3 megapixel resolution, (only the Sony NEX-7 is higher in the mirrorless category). While more pixels don't guarantee better quality, good news, this camera delivers.

The Good, the Bad and the Not Quite

The features on the Samsung NX200 mirror (no pun intended) those of many other mirrorless cameras: a selection of interchangeable lenses; a three inch OLED screen; wheels and buttons to navigate through the functions; manual and automatic options for exposure settings; high definition video recording; RAW plus various levels of JPEG files; an external flash attachment; and of course, the omnipresent (frou-frous) options of photo effects.

I liked the organization and logistics of the camera: the physical buttons, the rotating wheels, the on-screen menu choices, the straightforward explanations, and (most) of the features.

Though I still haven't found a mirrorless camera that has positioned the dedicated movie button in a great location. The NX200 places it on the back near the thumb grip, which makes it too easy to inadvertently press. (I had to laugh at the camera user's manual when it demonstrated the proper NX200 handclasp, positioning the thumb on top of the movie button.)

For Samsung NX200 memory cards, see Camera Accessories

Samsung should consider that curtailing straying fingers is not on our minds when literally chasing down a shot, whether crawling under tables chasing cute kitties or clawing up mountains chasing golden-hour sunlight.

Samsung NX200 Back

As for navigating to your favorite features, the NX200 provides dedicated buttons for items like ISO and Exposure Compensation. And there are various routes to reach various other functions, so you can chart whatever course works best for you.

If you have options that you often use like White Balance, you can program the Fn button on the camera's rear for direct access.

Of note, the rear viewing screen is not touch sensitive. You access and move through the menus with the buttons and dials.

The minimalist grip is workable which means no added camera voluminosity is necessary. Even so, with the kit lens, the NX200 will not snuggle into a pocket.

Since the camera's mechanical viscera are wrapped in more metal (less plastic) than its predecessors (and many competitors), the NX200 feels like it could withstand some abuse. Though the attachable flash that comes with the kit is more fragile.

Samsung says that the contrast has been upgraded and refined on the NX200's three-inch OLED screen. Maybe so, but I shot a kite festival on a sunny Sunday and the screen was virtually useless.

Now this problem of screens washing out in glaring light is common with almost any camera. Since the NX200 does not include a dedicated viewfinder, I finally abandoned the tedious squinting and settled for shooting from the hip.

Please give me an integrated viewfinder. (No camera will substitute for a DSLR without one.)

Moreover, there is no option from Samsung for an electronic or optical viewfinder. Money can't even buy one. Samsung NX200 Fashionistas

In kinder conditions, like a cloudy day during Fashion Week, the screen was much more readable and the shooting much more rewarding. Autofocus worked admirably, catching fashionistas in mid-stride.

The NX200 boasts of an ISO range of 100 to 12,800, which is slightly higher than standard. I shoot with the camera set to high ISO numbers because I like night shooting.

Sure, the inevitable invasive noise and blur exponentially impedes the clarity of the images, but I would rather have the shot - warts and all - than have nothing. (Photo editing programs will minimize the damage but not magically clean up the image.)

Still, for best results stick with the lower ISO numbers. At 800, noise is evident. At 1600, it becomes problematic.

The ability to shoot panoramas is an addictive feature. The NX200's panorama sweep is not loud nor temperamental as its closest nemesis, the Sony NEX5n. Moreover, the NX200 goes vertically or horizontally without needing to reconfigure the camera settings. (Thank goodness.)

The HD video quality is good, but sound is still the neglected off-spring of the universal family of mirrorless cameras, marginalized on the NX200 even more by the absence of a port to plug in an external microphone.

As of this writing, Samsung offers a limited selection of compatible lenses that include the basic pancake, wide angle and telephoto types. Samsung still does not offer a power zoom lens that is useful for shooting videos.

The user manual is pretty good at explaining the overflow of the NX200's functions and features. None of the new mirrorless cameras are as easy to use as they claim.

You undoubtedly have often heard that cameras don't make good photos, photographers do. I beg to differ. You and your camera can create winning pictures, but first you have to master the machine.

The on-screen explanations and reminders provide welcome help, but proficiency still requires probing, practice and patience. And the NX200 is no exception.

Conclusion

Finally, the Samsung NX200 is one of the most expensive cameras in this shootout. If you don't want or need a camera with a dedicated viewfinder, then the thought of the image quality captured by the NX200's 20 megapixel APS-C sensor might be reason enough to pry your wallet open a little wider.

It is not a strong enough reason to displace the more moderately priced Sony's NEX-5N from its Best Mirrorless Camera throne.

Samsung NX200 Photo Gallery


Fashion Week Lincoln Center

More about the Samsung NX200

Samsung NX200 spec sheet

Reader Comments(11 comments)

Posted Feb 24, 2013 4:41:24 PM
By ARTHUR MCVAY
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I OWN A V1, I HAVE HEARD ALL THE NEGATIVE COMMENTS AND WHILST THEY MAY ALL BE VALID, I CANNOT FAULT THE QUALITY OF THE PICTURES I HAVE TAKEN WITH IT
Posted Jan 18, 2013 6:58:23 AM
By stephen rudolph
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
leaving out the x-pro1 and omd-em5 is like leaving out Angelina Jolie or Charlize Theron out of the 'list of the top 10 sexiest hollywood actresses '. Top 6 according to who's ranking ? and if its in sales, it doesnt make it a 'top' camera. a lot of people buy according to price and not quality.
Posted Dec 28, 2012 10:45:52 AM
By Francis Josey
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I think you did a fine job with the article and agree with your conclusions, I DO wish you had included the NEX 7 and the X-pro 1. I own 4 MILCs, Sony 5n and 7, Fuji X-pro 1, and the Samsung NX-200. All great performers, but the 5n is amazing for engineering reasons I will never understand. It beats all the others although they all have strong points. I'll end with a question, Did you consider including the Ricoh GXR A16 at all ????
Posted Nov 14, 2012 8:12:41 AM
By Bill F.
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Why didn't you include the Fujifilm X-pro 1 or the XE-1? These have excellent image quality, easily rivaling top-end DSLRs. Excellent lenses and easy to use. The ONLY mirrorless cameras to date that do not have a low-pass filter, and so give very sharp images. Just wondering why these were avoided (or just overlooked?)
Posted Nov 12, 2012 4:03:10 PM
By Docrwm
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
The K-01 has dropped in price, with the 40XS pancake lens, to $349 at many sellers. The Q has dropped to as low as $299 with 01 Prime lens and frequently goes for $346 with it or the 02 Zoom. At those prices they are killer cameras and real bargains.
Posted Nov 12, 2012 4:00:54 PM
By Docrwm
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Well, the Q is now selling for around $350 for camera plus either the 01 Prime or the 02 Zoom Standard Lens. I got my Q with the 01 8.5mm f1.9 lens for $299 BNIB last week. So, at that price (and with an adapter for my K mount lenses) it's an incredible Macro and fantastic Telephoto performer. Plus - it's the most fun camera I have ever used.
Posted Oct 2, 2012 9:19:44 AM
By varun
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
what about the Sony NEX C3? with the f3 out recently, C3 should be available at a discount. other than full HD video, what are the major differences? is it worth paying extra for the F3?
Posted Aug 28, 2012 11:27:28 AM
By Dick De Jong
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
We have the D-5 in for review. It's a great, stylish camera. I find it a bit pricey at almost $1000 for the body only. Ultimately, you need to decide if the premium is worth it.
Posted Aug 18, 2012 10:15:18 AM
By Peggy
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Ready to purchase the Olympus OMD 5...any feedback?
Posted Aug 16, 2012 11:09:42 AM
By Chris
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I was wondering the same thing! Been looking very hard at the Olympus OM-D E-M5 and would like to hear your opinions on it.
Posted Aug 14, 2012 4:42:30 PM
By Bill Steen
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Thoughts about the Olympus OMD 5?